Triazine Special Review Nears End
Triazine Cumulative Risk Assessment
Simazine Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED)
Propazine Tolerance Reassessment Progress and Risk Management Decision (TRED)
REPORT: Two Decades of Atrazine
Yield Benefits Research

REPORT: Corn Yield Benefits of Atrazine Use in Illinois

Who We Are
e-mail us



The Triazine Network is a coalition of agricultural grower organizations and individuals formed in 1995 as a result of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Special Review of the Triazine herbicides.

 

Special Review Nears End

EPA Releases Favorable Risk Assessment
for Triazines

Network Thanks the Many Groups Who Submitted Comments by Aug. 21, 2006 Deadline

EPA concluded "...there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general U.S. population, infants, children, or other major identifiable subgroups of consumers from aggregate exposure…to cumulative residues of atrazine and the other chlorinated triazine pesticides."

 

Growers from across the nation were happy to see the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) favorable risk assessment for the Triazine herbicides. The assessment was released in June and EPA "..the Agency has found that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general U.S. population, infants, children, or other major identifiable subgroups of consumers from aggregate exposure…to cumulative residues of atrazine and the other chlorinated triazine pesticides."

EPA also released a Reregistration Eligibility Decision for simazine and a tolerance assessment for propazine. These actions bring the special review of the Triazine near an end.

“We weren’t asking for much, just that EPA used good science to make a decision on the Triazine herbicides,” White said. “If sound scientific research proved that the Triazines posed a danger, we were ready to accept that. However, the research proved what we believed all along—the triazines are safe.”

Network Was Key to Success
The Triazine Network was formed in 1995 after the EPA announced the special review of the Triazine herbicides atrazine, simazine and cyanazine. Cyanazine was later removed after the registrant voluntarily offered to phase out its use. Propazine was added based on the intent of a registrant to expand the existing greenhouse label to include grain sorghum.

The Network made the unprecedented move of bringing growers of more than 30 commodities to the table for the special review.

“EPA told us they had never had grower involvement like this,” White said. “The special review process is open to stakeholders and I can’t think of anyone who had a bigger stake in this process than growers. Our network included some of the top names in agriculture across the board. Without the expertise and commitment of our members, we would not have succeeded.”

White has been chairman of the Network since its inception and on many occasions participated in meetings, hearings and technical briefings giving the growers’ perspective, including the importance and usage, to EPA officials.

“We’ve had a lot of things thrown at us since 1994 from fear mongering to frogs,” White said. “But it all comes down to using good scientific studies to reach the decision. We applaud EPA for sticking to the science.”

Next Step—Public Comment Period
EPA has now opened a public comment period that ends August 21, 2006. Growers are encouraged to submit comments to the docket in support of the Triazine herbicides. This issue of the Triazine Network News provides information on how to make your docket submission.


Understanding the Three Regulatory Actions
As required by the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA), a cumulative risk assessment, which evaluates exposures based on a common mechanism of toxicity, was conducted to evaluate the risk from food, drinking water, and non-occupational exposure resulting from all registered uses of chlorinated triazine pesticides. The chlorinated triazine group includes the pesticides atrazine, simazine, and propazine, in addition to their three chlorinated degradates. Propazine, however, was not incorporated into the cumulative risk assessment because no dietary, drinking water, or residential human exposure to propazine is anticipated from any of the currently registered uses. The Agency concurrently issued for public comment the Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for simazine and the Tolerance Reassessment Progress and Risk Management Decision (TRED) for propazine.

Triazine Cumulative Risk Assessment
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a favorable risk assessment for the Triazine herbicides. The assessment was released in June and EPA concluded that the cumulative risks associated with Triazine herbicides “pose no harm that would result to the general U.S. population, infants, children or other … consumers.” Click here for talking points.

Simazine Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED)
Simazine is a systemic herbicide that is usually applied to soil, absorbed through roots, and acts by inhibiting photosynthesis within the targeted plant. EPA has reviewed simazine through the public participation process that the Agency uses in developing pesticide reregistration and tolerance reassessment decisions. EPA has determined that the database to support reregistration is substantially complete and that products containing simazine are eligible for reregistration provided the risks are mitigated either in the manner described in the RED or by another means that achieves equivalent risk reduction. Click here for talking points.

Propazine Tolerance Reassessment Progress and Risk Management Decision (TRED)
Propazine, also a systemic herbicide, currently is registered in the U.S. for indoor greenhouse use only, and has existing tolerances established for residues on sorghum. EPA has evaluated the existing propazine sorghum tolerances and determined that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm to the general population, infants, children, or other major identifiable subgroups of consumers will result from these tolerances. Dietary exposure to propazine was determined to be essentially zero; propazine, therefore, was found to pose no risk concerns. The four propazine sorghum tolerances (forage, grain, stover, and sweet) are considered reassessed and meet FQPA safety standards. No mitigation measures are necessary for propazine at this time. The Agency has received and will consider a request for a new use of propazine on sorghum in the U.S. EPA's Propazine TRED that is available for public comment until August 21, 2006. Click here for talking points.

 

Talking Points for Triazine Cumulative Risk Assessment
On June 21, 2006, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued the Re-registration Eligibility Decision for simazine and a favorable cumulative risk assessment for the triazine herbicides. These actions bring EPA’s Triazine Special Review near a close, a process that began in late 1994.

The EPA concluded that the cumulative risks associated with triazine herbicides pose “no harm that would result to the general U.S. population, infants, children or other...consumers.”

We are now in a public comment period, which ends August 21, 2006, and we ask for your help in demonstrating grower support for atrazine and simazine. Please review the key points below and consider writing to EPA.

In your letter, consider commending EPA for:
Its classification of atrazine and simazine as “not likely” to cause cancer in humans
Harmonizing product labels to ensure that users of all atrazine products engage in the same use practices—practices which have already made a significant improvement in environmental impact

Coordinating with other Agency offices

Sticking to sound science in its comprehensive reviews

Providing many opportunities for public comment in its proceedings
Let EPA know how important the triazine herbicides are to you or your organization or crop as reliable, cost-effective and safe tools for weed control.

Commend EPA for further protecting people and the environment by harmonizing certain aspects of the simazine label with current atrazine labels. These measures include a discontinuance of non-crop uses, such as rights-of-way, and a match of atrazine’s maximum corn rate of 2.5 lbs per acre.

Mention that this latest decision by EPA echoes favorable safety assessments conducted by the World Health Organization (1998), United Kingdom for European Union authorities (2000) and Australia (2004).

Recognize EPA for implementing site-specific monitoring, an innovative and science-based approach which insured U.S. farmers continue to benefit from atrazine. Now, as successes in the field continue to lessen the need for the program, it may be time to consider how a phase-out of the monitoring would be implemented.

IN ADDITION FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION
Ask that EPA prioritize raising the Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for atrazine and simazine. The registration decisions establish new drinking water levels of comparison (DWLOC) of 12.5-68 ppb for the herbicides and their metabolites, based on the latest available science. The MCLs should now be revised accordingly.


 
Talking Points for Simazine RED

U.S. growers rely on simazine.

Simazine offers effective, broad spectrum weed control and low risk of crop injury in a variety of fruit and nut crops. It is particularly important to farmers who grow fruits and nuts in California and citrus crops in Florida.

Unlike many other herbicides, depending on the crop, simazine can be applied prior to, during or after planting the crop, or after crop emergence, fitting a wide variety of cropping systems including soil-saving conservation tillage systems.

Simazine is an effective tank mix partner with other herbicides, making it an important tool in weed resistance management.

Label harmonization with atrazine makes sense.

EPA is further protecting people and the environment by harmonizing certain aspects of the simazine label with current atrazine labels. These measures include a discontinuance of non-crop uses, such as rights-of-way, and a match of atrazine’s maximum corn rate of 2.5 lbs per acre.

Simazine is correctly classified as “not likely” to cause cancer.

In the RED, EPA classifies simazine as “not likely” to cause cancer in humans. This supports a ruling in 1999 by the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), which re-categorized simazine as “not classifiable as to carcinogenicity in humans.”

Simazine presence in community water systems is negligible.

As it did with atrazine, EPA is requiring a site-specific program for monitoring simazine levels in U.S. drinking water systems. Only six water systems warrant initial inclusion in the program. Only one of the water systems had annual average concentrations of simazine exceeding the agency’s level of concern. The other five were added as a result of predictive modeling.

Simazine concentrations continue to decline in U.S. drinking water systems due to changes in use and adoption by farmers of best management practices, such as buffer strips.

IN ADDITION FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION
EPA has required registrants to establish a website and toll-free number to provide updates on simazine in these systems. (Visit www.simazine-watershed.info or call 1-888-365-2874.) Considering how few systems are in the monitoring program, and the fact that none warrant mitigation, requiring growers to access these updates prior to legally using simazine places an unnecessary burden on the agricultural community.

New setbacks have been added to wells and waterways. Please comment on how these may negatively impact your farm.

 

Talking Points for Propazine TRED
The Agency has received and will consider a request for a new use of propazine on sorghum in the U.S.

EPA's Propazine TRED is available for public comment until August 21, 2006.
Propazine has reduced phyto and yield impact versus many alternatives.

Growers benefit from propazine’s ease of application (preemergent residual).

Propazine can play an important role in resistance management.

Propazine has substantial benefits in grain sorghum crop rotation systems

 

 

 


Website maintained by sschulte@ksgrains.com